Skip to main content

AAAATMMMMMssss

History of free ATM usage

Before April 1, 2009, if you had to use the ATM of any bank with whom you don't have any banking relationship, you ended up paying fees. It meant you had to find the closest ATM belonging to your bank to withdraw cash and make balance inquiries. So RBI introduced a directive to the banks to allow free use of ATM machines irrespective of which bank a customer had accounts with.

This meant that irrespective of which bank you bank with, you could use any other bank's ATM free of cost. However the banks were only to charge for the cash withdrawal made by the customers by using their credit cards, while cash withdrawal on debit card was made free. So with effect from April 1, 2009, you could withdraw cash from any ATM free of charge.

Banks make a loss

However, this has not worked out in the favour of banks. Earlier when the use of ATM was not free, the interchange fee was borne by the customers. This fee covered the expenses incurred by both the concerned banks when a customer from bank A used the ATM of bank B. This meant bank A paid an interchange fee of Rs 18 to Rs 20 to bank B per transaction.

Once the ATM usage became free, this fee was borne by the banks. This made banks approach RBI through IBA, which is the industry lobby of Indian banks. They had submitted some recommendations to the central bank last month citing the financial burden faced by banks on account of huge number of third party withdrawals and small-ticket withdrawals.

One of them was to impose a withdrawal limit of Rs 10,000 per transaction at the third-party ATM as well as limit such transactions to 5 per month. The RBI after mulling over the suggestions has now agreed to both these recommendations and communicated the same officially to IBA.

Why did this happen

The underlying cause for this was the fact that most banks were losing money in comparison to the value of the transaction. So if a person withdrew just Rs 100, his bank ended up bearing this interchange fee, which worked out to be quite expensive. E.g. ICICI Bank is losing around Rs 4-5 crore (Rs 4-50 million) per month, as most of its customers have opted to use third-party ATMs.

Also, if a customer uses the free ATM facility for his current account, the banks not only end up losing money in the form of interchange fee but also have to contend with low float (balance in the account). This is because current accounts don't have requirement of maintenance of minimum balance and any money deposited here, doesn't earn interest. Hence, the banks' recommendations to impose limit on the amount withdrawn as well as number of free transactions.

Will free ATM usage fall out?

The recent announcement from RBI curtailing the use of free ATMs to five times a month and a upper limit of Rs 10,000 per ATM withdrawal, the joy of the consumer in availing this service has become shortlived. However, with people working 24x7, but banks not being open during that time, customers will always have a need to use ATMs of other banks.

Also certain banks don't have pan-India presence nor have multiple branches at various points. So customers of these banks will always end up using the ATMs of other banks. Hence, it is impossible that inter-bank ATM usage will see a fall out but will definitely come in handy for emergencies and urgent cash requirements.

RBI did take an innovative step by making ATMs free for all the customers of all the banks. However, as banks started losing money as the value of transactions at third-party ATMs did not justify the interchange fee, a sort of middle ground has been reached to keep both the banks and consumers happy.

Comments

M_U_K_U_N{U_V} said…
Welcome Back Sir..

OKay ab pata laga mujhe ye kya funda hai sara.. Thnx for D information engine to start and deliver infos. :)


Maine ye bhi suna hai ye shayad se November me apply bhi kar diya jayega and once again customers will have to bear up these charges of inter bank transactions is that so??

Popular posts from this blog

All they want is a pleasant experience for us

My experiences with this gloomy world continue. I may sound repetitive and annoying, but there's a reality check for all of us who think that the world is fine as long as the Covid-19 doesn't hit us and our paychecks continue to flow into the banks.  The store in the picture is amongst the busiest in the area, always remains full and explodes with the people on the Saturdays. A typical brand in a store, let's say a Van Heusen makes about ₹200,000 to ₹220,000 of sales on the weekend. As of today, the store does about ₹10,000 to ₹15,000 of revenues of the same brand, and the footfalls are not even 5 per cent of what they otherwise used to witness. Ironically, a store of this size would have 8-10 salesman with an average basic salary of ₹10,000 to ₹12,000 a month and the balance they earn (~₹5,000-₹7,500) is all linked to the sales of the brand. For them, purchases from the store cover-up for the livelihood, savings and the investments and there are no concept of "work fr

Inconsequential empathically

I have been an extremely moody blogger for long, but since the last few months, it seems that I am writing only to share the melancholy that surrounds me. Not a post I should write(for others to read) on a Monday morning and not that the good things aren't happening around, but guess, going out on the weekend or a weekday, the illustrations of the issues this world is grappling with have profoundly controlled the lens of my life. It is hard for me to accept as to how can we be so indifferent to be thinking only about the life that we could manage within the four walls of the house. Certainly, some of us are chosen ones that the disruption outside hasn't impacted us widely but has that made us think too much just about the family or us? Is the new normal just about being self-focussed, no matter how inconsequential we become socially or empathically? Do we even care as to what repercussions it would have on the new era we are entrenching, or the question remains just about survi